Epiphany Blogfast

Brethren, Peace and Good to all of you. I wish you all a Happy New Year 2012 along with all your families and friends.

In observance of the holidays, I’ll be making a blogfast through Epiphany. Please, enjoy the contents currently online.

May God bless you this Christmas and Epiphany seasons.

Today we honor the Holy Family

Brethren, may the Peace and Good of Our Lord Jesus Christ be with all of you.

Since there are no Sundays in the Christmas Octave this year, today we honor the Holy Family of Jesus, Mary, and Joseph.

True blessedness is found on this earth in one’s family. God became a member of a human family Himself, a nuclear family and an extended family.

Twenty-five years ago this day, my wife and I became parents for the first time, starting our own family – Happy birthday to my eldest son today!

May all of us who are fathers and mothers care, nurture, and strengthen our own families;

May all of us who are sons and daughters of living parents honor and cherish them in this life and the next;

May all of us who are brothers and sisters support, comfort, and assist our siblings.

May the example of the Holy Family of Nazareth be before us, always and forever, Amen.

Blessed John Paul on Natural Law and Conscience

From the Encyclical Veritatis Splendor by Blessed Pope John Paul the Great:

43. The Second Vatican Council points out that the "supreme rule of life is the divine law itself, the eternal, objective and universal law by which God out of his wisdom and love arranges, directs and governs the whole world and the paths of the human community. God has enabled man to share in this divine law, and hence man is able under the gentle guidance of God's providence increasingly to recognize the unchanging truth".[78]

The Council refers back to the classic teaching on "God's eternal law." Saint Augustine defines this as "the reason or the will of God, who commands us to respect the natural order and forbids us to disturb it".[79] Saint Thomas identifies it with "the type of the divine wisdom as moving all things to their due end".[80] And God's wisdom is providence, a love which cares. God himself loves and cares, in the most literal and basic sense, for all creation (cf. Wis 7:22; 8:11). But God provides for man differently from the way in which he provides for beings which are not persons. He cares for man not "from without", through the laws of physical nature, but "from within", through reason, which, by its natural knowledge of God's eternal law, is consequently able to show man the right direction to take in his free actions.[81] In this way God calls man to participate in his own providence, since he desires to guide the world--not only the world of nature but also the world of human persons--through man himself, through man's reasonable and responsible care. The "natural law" enters here as the human expression of God's eternal law. Saint Thomas writes: "Among all others, the rational creature is subject to divine providence in the most excellent way, insofar as it partakes of a share of providence, being provident both for itself and for others. Thus it has a share of the Eternal Reason, whereby it has a natural inclination to its proper act and end. This participation of the eternal law in the rational creature is called natural law".[82]

44. The Church has often made reference to the Thomistic doctrine of natural law, including it in her own teaching on morality. Thus my Venerable Predecessor Leo XIII emphasized "the essential subordination of reason and human law to the Wisdom of God and to his law." After stating that "the 'natural law' is written and engraved in the heart of each and every man, since it is none other than human reason itself which commands us to do good and counsels us not to sin", Leo XIII appealed to the "higher reason" of the divine Lawgiver: "But this prescription of human reason could not have the force of law unless it were the voice and the interpreter of some higher reason to which our spirit and our freedom must be subject". Indeed, the force of law consists in its authority to impose duties, to confer rights and to sanction certain behaviour: "Now all of this, clearly, could not exist in man if, as his own supreme legislator, he gave himself the rule of his own actions". And he concluded: "It follows that the natural law is "itself the eternal law," implanted in beings endowed with reason, and inclining them "towards their right action and end," it is none other than the eternal reason of the Creator and Ruler of the universe".[83]

Man is able to recognize good and evil thanks to that discernment of good from evil which he himself carries out by his "reason, in particular by his reason enlightened by Divine Revelation and by faith," through the law which God gave to the Chosen People, beginning with the commandments on Sinai. Israel was called to accept and to live out God's law" as "a particular gift and sign of its election and of the divine Covenant," and also as a pledge of God's blessing. Thus Moses could address the children of Israel and ask them: "What great nation is that that has a god so near to it as the Lord our God is to us, whenever we call upon him? And what great nation is there that has statutes and ordinances so righteous as all this law which I set before you this day?" (Dt 4:7-8). In the Psalms we encounter the sentiments of praise, gratitude and veneration which the Chosen People is called to show towards God's law, together with an exhortation to know it, ponder it and translate it into life. "Blessed is the man who walks not in the counsel of the wicked, nor stands in the way of sinners, nor sits in the seat of scoffers, but his delight is in the law of the Lord and on his law he meditates day and night" (Ps 1:1-2). "The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple; the precepts of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes" (Ps 18/19:8-9).

We remember today the Holy Innocents, First Martyrs

Even before they learn to speak, they proclaim Christ

The Holy Innocents: that's the name traditional Catholic piety uses to refer to the children, 2 years and under, that Herod killed in Bethlehem, hoping by this to also kill the Christ Child. Eastern iconography portrays the event as "Rachel Weeping for Her Children," a reference to the Prophet Jeremiah (3:15-17) also echoed in St. Matthew's Gospel (2:16-18):



Thus saith the LORD; A voice was heard in Ramah, lamentation, and bitter weeping; Rachel weeping for her children refused to be comforted for her children, because they were not. Thus saith the LORD; Refrain thy voice from weeping, and thine eyes from tears: for thy work shall be rewarded, saith the LORD; and they shall come again from the land of the enemy. And there is hope in thine end, saith the LORD, that thy children shall come again to their own border.
The Troparion of the Feast is very succint; it highlights the apparent contradiction of the tragedy:
As acceptable victims and freshly plucked flowers, as divine firstfruits and newborn lambs, you were offered to Christ who was born as a Child, O most pure children. You mocked Herod's wickedness: now we beseech you, unceasingly pray for our souls. (Source)
Bishop St. Quodvultdeus, in today's Office of Readings, provides another insight into the event:
A tiny child is born, who is a great king. Wise men are led to him from afar. They come to adore one who lies in a manger and yet reigns in heaven and on earth. When they tell of one who is born a king, Herod is disturbed. To save his kingdom he resolves to kill him, though if he would have faith in the child, he himself would reign in peace in this life and for ever in the life to come.

Why are you afraid, Herod, when you hear of the birth of a king? He does not come to drive you out, but to conquer the devil. But because you do not understand this you are disturbed and in a rage, and to destroy one child whom you seek, you show your cruelty in the death of so many children.

You are not restrained by the love of weeping mothers or fathers mourning the deaths of their sons, nor by the cries and sobs of the children. You destroy those who are tiny in body because fear is destroying your heart. You imagine that if you accomplish your desire you can prolong your own life, though you are seeking to kill Life himself.

Yet your throne is threatened by the source of grace, so small, yet so great, who is lying in the manger. He is using you, all unaware of it, to work out his own purposes freeing souls from captivity to the devil. He has taken up the sons of the enemy into the ranks of God’s adopted children.

The children die for Christ, though they do not know it. The parents mourn for the death of martyrs. The child makes of those as yet unable to speak fit witnesses to himself. See the kind of kingdom that is his, coming as he did in order to be this kind of king. See how the deliverer is already working deliverance, the saviour already working salvation.

But you, Herod, do not know this and are disturbed and furious. While you vent your fury against the child, you are already paying him homage, and do not know it.

How great a gift of grace is here! To what merits of their own do the children owe this kind of victory? They cannot speak, yet they bear witness to Christ. They cannot use their limbs to engage in battle, yet already they bear off the palm of victory.
(Source)
Finally, the antiphon to the Benedictus in today's Morning Prayer is most eloquent:
At the king's command these innocent babies and little children were put to death; they died for Christ, and now in the glory of heaven as they follow him, the sinless Lamb, they sing for ever: Glory to you, O Lord.
It is most appropriate that we also remember today the little babies killed in today's abortion mills. Let us ask their intercession for us, their mothers, and those who defend their deaths as the free exercise of an inalienable "right." May we repent, do penance, and turn to God for forgiveness as doers and enablers of this grievous sin.

Abby's New Ride!


Well, it wasn't to be another Ford as I wanted but new cars even the little tini wini ones are a little too expensive and since we'll probably be stuck with a payment for at least another six years it had to be something more affordable so we could have a comfortable monthly payment. So, I started scanning the available stock at the autoplex here in my neck of the woods and one car in particular caught my eye, and of all brands a Chrysler.

A dark gray convertible with a decent amount of miles on the odometer and only a year old. I had to go drive this thing and also to see if the car was as nice in person as it was in the pictures. I was not disappointed, the car indeed looks super clean and when on it's very quiet.

So... at this point I called Abby to tell her I had found a very clean and nice looking car at the price range we were looking into and that although not new the car pretty much looks new. So, I sent her this image as a teaser and then gave her the dealership's Internet addy so she could see the rest of the pics.

I think it's safe to say she saw it and liked it immediately.

As exciting as buying a car can be it also can be an unpleasant experience. Haggling and negotiating for a lower price can always take it's toll, but at this dealership there is none of that, and this will be the fifth car that has been purchased by me or a relative at this dealership and in this particular case my fiance.

Looks very nice, front and back.

So the question is will the paperwork come back from California in time for them to release the car to me so I can take it to her. I will be leaving for Cali on Wednesday and I will wait until early afternoon, otherwise I will just drive my trusty steed and we will pick it up when we come back to Phoenix on Friday.

So, although anything can go south at the last minute I think this is pretty much a done deal.








Abby, congratulations on your new set of wheels, I know you will enjoy it very much.

Another example of the ACLU’s moral darkness


Freedom of conscience: a freedom under attack.Brethren, Peace and Good in the Name of Our Lord Jesus, whose first Advent we make present again today. May joy, peace, and love flow to you from the throne of the Blessed Trinity into your hearts this day and always.

The Washington Post reported last week:

Twelve nurses who sued one of the state’s largest hospitals after claiming they were forced to assist in abortions over their religious and moral objections reached a deal Thursday with their employer in federal court.

Under the agreement, 12 nurses in the same-day surgery unit of the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey can remain in their current positions and not be compelled to assist in any part of an abortion procedure. The nurses must only help in a life-threatening emergency if no other non-objecting staff members are available and only until which time one can be brought in to relieve them, according to the agreement.

I want to highlight the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) reaction to the settlement:

The ACLU, which was not party to the suit, said it was concerned about a growing number of similar cases around the country as what the organization sees as an effort to use religion to discriminate in a health care context.

“No one should ever have to worry about facing discrimination when they check into the hospital,” said Brigitte Amiri, an attorney with the ACLU’s Reproductive Freedom Project. “No woman should have to fear that medical staff will place ideology over duty or deny her care.”

The ACLU’s reaction is disturbing and illustrative of the moral darkness reigning within their organization. Why? Because they equate the exercise of conscience with adherence to an ideology, presumably something that they are free from themselves.

Conscience is not ideology. Conscience is the medium through which human beings perceive and acknowledge the imperatives of the divine, eternal moral law. No human agency can force people to act against their conscience. No one should be penalized in their employment for having exercised their right conscience. As the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council observed:

The social nature of man, however, itself requires that he should give external expression to his internal acts of religion: that he should share with others in matters religious; that he should profess his religion in community. Injury therefore is done to the human person and to the very order established by God for human life, if the free exercise of religion is denied in society, provided just public order is observed. – Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae

By equating conscience with ideology, the ACLU, which pretends to be the defender of civil freedoms and rights, has instead embraced a totalitarian principle to be imposed upon the consciences of Christian people under cover of law. The ACLU’s position, then, represents a defense of the state’s power to coerce our consciences: it is the beginning of all tyranny.

Along with Planned Parenthood, the ACLU is yet another malignant organization our country can do without. Though I can only speak for myself, I lend my voice to a number of others and I am confident that we can state that we will not sacrifice our hard-earned rights over the ACLU’s altar of tyranny.

Christ is born! Come, let us adore Him!


nativity-icon11

The Christmas Kalend or Proclamation

In the year 5199 from the creation of the world, from the beginning, when God created the heavens and the earth; 2,957 years from the flood; 2,015 years from the birth of Abraham; 1,510 years from Moses and the Exodus of Israel from Egypt; 1,031 years from the anointment of David as king; in the 65th week of Daniel's prophecy; in the 194th Olympiad; in the year 752 of the foundation of Rome; in the year 42 of the reign of Octavius Augustus; the whole world being at peace; in the sixth age of the world: Jesus Christ, eternal God and eternal Son of the Father; wishing to consecrate the world through his most merciful Advent, having being conceived of the Holy Spirit, and having passed 9 months from his conception, He was born, He was made Man, from the Virgin Mary, in Bethlehem of Judah.

We wish you all a happy and blessed Christmas Day!

Merry Christmas Familia!

I did not get the chance this year to print and mail the Christmas cards so I am sending you this virtual one in hopes that it will reach all of you my family and friends in time for Christmas.

Wishing you
a very merry Christmas
and an new year
filled with happiness.

A reply to Dave N on Catholic Activism to Protect Natural Marriage

Brethren, Peace and Good to all of you in Jesus Christ Our Lord.

The following is my reply to Dave N., who kindly left a couple of commentaries on my post, titled, "LGBTs" in San Francisco up in arms against Archbishop Niederauer , my latest reply was too long for the comm box, so here it is. His thoughts are in red italics. Thank you kindly for your patience and attention.

The things you claim I characterized as "ridiculous" ... I didn't.

I didn't said you said it. I attributed it to the "post-modernist peanut gallery." You should not feel accused, unless of course, you are sitting with them. Are you?

What I DID say was ridiculous is the assertion that same-gender couples, including some I know that have been in committed relationships for over 20 years, were and are driven by the same lustful, self-indulgent, destructive drives that the gang-rapists of Sodom were. And that is what the Catechism requires one to believe if its reference to the Sodom story is to make any sense. And that view of the Sodom story is not just that of "some isolated 20th-century exegetes" ... it is quite clearly what the story is about. And when it comes to the NT, I'm not sure a Catholic should be quite so dismissive of scholarly views of the USCCB and NAB translators, either.

Again, I'm not dismissing outright the interpretations of some -and I reemphasize, some 20th century exegetes regarding these Bible verses. Again, theirs is not the only scholarly interpretation, there are others in the 20th, 21st and even before that also bear on the question. And again I repeat, the Catholic Moral position is not solely based on those verses alone as you allege, but is bigger, vaster if you will, and includes non-theological claims as derived from Natural Law, which is the morality that can be discovered by reason acting alone.

As for US civil law, theological arguments aren't really relevant (as per the Establishment Clause of the 1st Amendment), nor is your desire to avoid being "outcasts."

I don't mind being an outcast as defined by the dominant pagan culture. I do, however, defend my civil rights to believe, assemble, and petition my representatives whenever and however I like and I will not surrender those rights, and I will defend those rights come hell and high water.
Nor is this a debate about "theological arguments", but really about if a nation, founded on the bedrock of Natural Law Morality can in fact survive without such bedrock. That Catholic Moral Theology and Natural Law philosophy have convergent aims, well that's true, but one doesn't need to be a Catholic - or indeed a believer - to recognize, ellucidate, and apply Natural Law morality to policy. The "progressive" attempt to reduce the argument for traditional marriage to one of irrelevant theology is a fallacy.

Yet, there is an implied argument here that is seldom addressed by same-sex marriage advocates when they rail against "theological arguments" and it is not that they oppose that the governments recognize the Virgin Birth or the Resurrection of Christ. What they oppose is that the *moral demands* of the Gospel be recognized and applied by governments and this, very selectively, for they would agree in principle that feeding those who can't feed themselves, or extending health care to those who can't afford it, or caring for the elderly and the infirm are convergent moral demands made in the Gospel to which all can agree.

No, the opposition by homosexualists against Gospel morality is aimed specifically against any words in the teaching of Christ that can be remotedly interpreted as indicating a "big picture" anthropology of human beings having a nature gifted with attributes oriented toward a supernatural end, a morality that includes the entirety of our bodily and spiritual beings that sanctifies our objective reality as sexual beings. Homosexualists reject a "whole package" reception of the Gospel, by affirming a view of total sexual autonomy aover and against the view of holistic approach to human nature transmitted in the Gospel. This is the principal - if not the sole - "theological view" the homosexualist reject when they say "don't you impose your morality on me" as they go ahead imposing theirs upon others, by government imposition when at all possible.

The fact is that if federal, state, and local governments eventually come to recognize civil marriages for same-gender couples, that won't make you any more or less an outcast than you already are.

Nice flourish, but wrong argument, for the injection into policy and law of the homosexualist worldview necessarily delegitimizes the defenders of traditional marriage and of natural law morality and undervalue their views.

Trying to wage that war by fighting to maintain/pass laws that negatively impact those that you disagree with is an inappropriate and counterproductive choice of a battlefield.

This noble aspiration should cut both ways, shouldn't? But it doesn't in practice, as we've been getting the sharp edge of the blade nowadays.

And as for bigotry -- Merriam-Webster defines intolerant as follows: "unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights: bigoted."

Yes, funny you mention that, because I traced and reflected on the "tolerance" definition game in chronological order here, here, and here.

Modern lexicographers and semanticists should be forgiven for formulating definitions useful to the needs of those who fight the imposition of certain morality upon themselves, while imposing their upon others, using the coercive power of the state whenever possible. Perhaps they had racism and the Civil Rights movement in mind when they redid the lexicon, unsuspecting that the definition would be seized by others whose cause have nothing to do with racial bigotry and discrimination.

People should respect the right of Catholics to make their theological case as to why they believe same-gender relationships are always wrong, and enforce their conclusions on their own members as they see fit. But when you try to deprive same-gender couples of legal rights, benefits, and protections granted to straight married couples, using the worst sorts of negative stereotypes to make your case, you actually have moved into an area where the term "bigoted" quite literally applies.

The Gospel has social implications. We have always understood that, that's why we invented hospitals, demythologized the practice of medicine, organize the state to feed the hungry and protect the poor and infirm from arbitrary action and so on and so forth. We understand that morality is accesible by reason acting alone and that the conclusions of this Natural Law morality converge with that of revealed morality and as such, in the public arena in a free society, we have both the right and the obligation to pursue virtue in social practice, in economics, in legislation, etc. We are not going to be corralled into our churches as if these were reservations where we can practice our subculture "safely" and without "damaging" any one else. Our message is for all and as laymen, it is our vocation to pursue it without apology.

As for me being a bigot, I'll leave that judgment to those who know me best: my wife, and my confessor.

Thank you, Dave N., for commenting here in Vivificat and may the Lord bless you richly.

The allure of cats



Some of us are dog people, and others are cat people. Then there are those like me, who adore dogs and yet we find cats irresistible too. The only solution for us is to have (at least) one of each.

Fostering dogs has become a way of life for me over the past year, and my long-time canine companion Chica seems to have come to terms with the endless parade of strange dogs, from tiny bottle-feeders to a young puppy with a broken leg, a poodle with no social skills and a dachsund with Valley Fever who appears to be a fixture here, since it's hard to adopt out a sick dog, no matter how normal he may appear.

But the Capt and I both still have a yen for the unique company of a cat. We had a male named Pooz when we lived in California, as well as a little Maltese named Sofia, and they coexisted as though they'd never heard they were supposed to be natural enemies. Their interspecies wrestling matches on the living room rug were far more entertaining than TV. When we went sailing, we gave Pooz to a friend who lives on 64 acres, which we always thought would be a great life for him since he so enjoyed ranging far and wide. And Sofia died last year at 13. But now we have another Maltese named Chica, Chiquito the dachsund, the neighbors' Yorkie we babysit, and as of last week, another cat. Female, this time.

I've never had a female cat before and I'm impressed by the difference in her manner. Fé (Spanish for Faith) is the mellowest and most amiable creature I've ever had in my home. She was abandoned when her owner, a neighbor, had to leave in a hurry to help with a family emergency. For a few days I just went to the empty condo to feed her and let her sit in my lap for a while. There were four dogs in my house at the time and I didn't think she'd be happy being so outnumbered.

Finally, one day I took Lucy the poodle to her new home with a retired German lady who's smitten with her, and I brought Fé home. I put her in a crate, took her to the vet for worming and shots, and brought her to my house, crossing my fingers that Chica, Chiquito and Akira would keep the peace. For a couple of days I set up a baby gate in the living room doorway to mark off Fé's territory, and then gradually allowed the dogs into the room. There have been some tense moments, and some jealousy, but for the most part Fé has kept such a low profile they forget she's around until she speaks up. We've even had Chica and Fé in bed with us while we watched a movie.

So the question comes up, are we fostering this cat or are we adopting her? We might be able to find a home for her, though it's a lot easier to adopt out kittens. At some point soon we'll have to decide, but for now we'll just enjoy her company and see how it goes...

A quote from Mulieris Dignitatem

Blessed Pope John Paul the Great

The personal resources of femininity are certainly no less than the resources of masculinity: they are merely different. Hence a woman, as well as a man, must understand her "fulfilment" as a person, her dignity and vocation, on the basis of these resources, according to the richness of the femininity which she received on the day of creation and which she inherits as an expression of the "image and likeness of God" that is specifically hers. The inheritance of sin suggested by the words of the Bible - "Your desire shall be for your husband, and he shall rule over you" - can be conquered only by following this path. The overcoming of this evil inheritance is, generation after generation, the task of every human being, whether woman or man. For whenever man is responsible for offending a woman's personal dignity and vocation, he acts contrary to his own personal dignity and his own vocation.

Christmas Decorating?



And just like that Christmas is upon us, as every year I have been having fun watching Christmas movies although my list is a lot shorter this year since I no longer have the Hallmark channel and Lifetime basically sucked as they keep repeating the two or three movies they are showing.

Holiday Switch
A Christmas Proposal
Christmas in Paradise
The Holiday
Secret Santa
Dear Santa
An Accidental Christmas
Comfort and Joy
A Diva's Christmas Carol
Fred Claus
A Christmas Strike
Nothing Like the Holidays
The Road to Christmas
A Nanny for Christmas
Deck The Halls
Four Christmases


I used to get very substantial bonuses when I was working which year after year allowed me to buy a little something to almost every family member, but this year that changed so I called my magical daughter Michelle and gave her the task to take me shopping for Christmas presents for the kids and told her I was on a very tight budget. So armed with little money and a great attitude we left and when the girl at the register finished ringing all the items I was still left with three dollars to spare. Michelle you are magical indeed, thank you for the help.



As much as I love Christmas I normally don't do the lights on the house, I think the one year I did them they stayed up until that house was sold. However I love to see a Christmas tree and for one reason or another started getting Santas for Christmas and before I realized it I had a fairly big collections of Santa's. I grab a new Santa every chance I get. The best time to find things like this is right after Christmas as all the stores lower the prices to almost nothing. Oh, this year, my Santas also remain in a box in my garage.

Don't get me wrong, I am in a Christmas mood but I have been in a house deconstruction mode and so this year I am skipping all the decorating aspects of the season. But I am enjoying the religious side of it which should be the most important part to begin with.

As I write this I am listening to some of the Christmas Carols we will be singing during our Christmas Eve mass, and also going over the readings to be more prepared to listen to mass.

Since I am not decorating the house at least I made sure this post had plenty of lights.

"LGBTs" in San Francisco up in arms against Archbishop Niederauer

Brethren, Peace and Good to all of you. As many of you already know, the Archbishop of San Francisco, George Niederauer, "disinvited" openly homosexual Protestant clergy from Advent vespers in a local parish. The "LGBT Community" is thoroughly offended and is attempting to make this a wedge issue.

As part of that effort, an unknown writer - the piece has no byline, although the writer's identity is probably known by the regulars - of the San Francisco Guardian Online wrote a piece titled Catholic Church rejects LGBT ministers in which he vents his anger. I left a comment in their comm-box which I now reproduce here:

Quote:
I grew up in the Catholic Church, and it pretty much drove me away from religion. I could never quite get the basic contradictions between a message of love for all people and a politics of intolerance. (Jesus loves his children, except the women, who have to be second-class citizens, and the homosexuals, who are going to burn in Hell.)
It appears you missed CCD class the day they discussed this:
Chastity and homosexuality

2357 Homosexuality refers to relations between men or between women who experience an exclusive or predominant sexual attraction toward persons of the same sex. It has taken a great variety of forms through the centuries and in different cultures. Its psychological genesis remains largely unexplained. Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity,140 tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered."141 They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.

"2358 The number of men and women who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies is not negligible. They do not choose their homosexual condition; for most of them it is a trial. They must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. These persons are called to fulfill God's will in their lives and, if they are Christians, to unite to the sacrifice of the Lord's Cross the difficulties they may encounter from their condition.

"2359 Homosexual persons are called to chastity. By the virtues of self-mastery that teach them inner freedom, at times by the support of disinterested friendship, by prayer and sacramental grace, they can and should gradually and resolutely approach Christian perfection."
You misinform your readers when you state that the Church's stance is to hate homosexual persons. Far from it.

The thing is that just as there is no truth without love, there is no love without truth. We would be lying to you if we say that sexual relations - rather, the simulation of sexual relations - between members of the same sex, when engaged freely and with full knowledge, are healthy to your body, mind, and spirit. They are not and if we lie, our love for you would be a lie.

The Archbishop of San Francisco acted correctly and in accordance to the stated Catholic doctrine. Inviting clergy engaged in same-sex couplings would have confused people - something the good Archbishop learned the hard way four years ago - giving the impression that it is "OK" for people who profess love for Christ and for the Gospel and even purportedly seek to serve Him in ordained ministry while engaging in behavior against Nature and against Nature's God.

We have to preach the Gospel in and out of season and now it's definitely out of season and in San Francisco, much out of place. But we are not going shy away despite the calumnies, the hate, and the lies thrown against us.

May the Lord richly bless you, and may the Lord bless and keep the good Archbishop of San Francisco.

Yes Make Mine a Ford Please!

Ford, Fiesta

It actually looks like a nice little car to have, I bet it will be super economical on gas and sits four or five. Wow! But honest, does this look like guacamole green to you?


Fiesta: [fee-es-tuh; Sp. fyes-tah] (Party) -- A festival or a festive celebration.
It has to be fate, Abby's car has been screaming to be replaced and last week it kindda gave up and left her stranded at her own house. She needed to drive from Lancaster to La Puente to pick up her daughter and so she tried to rent a car from her cell phone but she was not successful, so I did it for her from Phoenix and according to the rental company she was to get a Chevrolet Aveo as I asked for a compact car.

She called me to let me know that she had picked up the car and that she actually liked it. What? She likes a Chevrolet? Well it turns out she did not get an Aveo but a 2011 Ford Fiesta and although it wasn't her favorite color (she called it guacamole green) she said it is a really nice little car and that now that we are on the marked for a new car she would be happy with something like that.

So, I think we will continue to be a Ford family and a little Ford will maybe join us pretty soon.

Hummmm we will see?

Matrimony and Divorce

Fr. Nicolas Schwizer

Las Bodas de Caná // The Wedding at Cana

…therefore a man will leave his father and his mother, and the two will become one flesh. So, they are no longer two, but one flesh. Well then, what God has bound together, man will not separate…

In the time of Jesus, no Jew questioned the right to divorce, since Moses had allowed it. What the Rabbis of that time discussed was the motives for divorce: whether it was reason enough that the woman burned the food or that the husband found another woman more beautiful.

Regardless, divorce was granted very easily. Pharisaic morality was based on the non-admitted inferiority of the woman who was considered property of the male. In light of this pharisaical legality, the Lord poses God’s original project exactly as it is described in Genesis. Union of the male and female expresses human fulfillment and happiness.

I believe this era – mores o than previous eras – has a greater need to meditate on this Gospel because in this Gospel, Jesus solemnly affirms the character of matrimony and the indissoluble unity of the spouses. And it is not about a law imposed on spouses. Rather, it traces the way to human happiness: it reveals that the familial and conjugal relationship is an inexhaustible source of creation and joy.

The changing of spouse gives the illusion of renewal, but it is nothing more than a new beginning destined to failure with the same obstacle as always…..selfishness, laziness, sterility of those who are unfaithful.

Often, the indissolubility of matrimony is understood and experienced as an obligation which limits the freedom of the spouses. But Christ has abolished the “law” and has given his life while opposing the “legal” licentiousness of the Jews. He did not invent any new obligation. The only thing He did was express the profound desire of love.

Because all authentic love wants to be eternal, it creates fidelity, demands commitment, aspires for discovery, pretends never to end, wants to grow and develop itself endlessly. No one who truly loves sets a deadline. No love exists by quotas or for periods of time. And, therefore, we have to cultivate love daily, we have to renew it permanently.

The true meaning of indissolubility is not, therefore, to prohibit a separation. Its value is fully positive: they will never finish knowing or loving each other. The nature of love and matrimony consists in developing indefinitely and in renewing without ceasing. When a human being begins to feel loved, he/she begins to change, to blossom, to discover himself/herself and to unfold without exhausting his/her resources.

Already Father Joseph Kentenich, founder of the Schoenstatt Movement, said this when he defined fidelity as: “creative and vigorous preservation of the first love.” And he referred not only to conjugal/married love, but to all forms of love: paternal love, maternal, filial (childlike), fraternal…..

One must work daily to create marriage/matrimony. Indissolubility is not a pillow on which the spouses may sleep, rather it is a calling to renew and enliven their love daily.

Dear brothers and sisters, I invite you to renew the great loves in your life: love for family, spouse, children, siblings and brothers and sisters in community.

Questions for reflection

1. Am I committed to strive daily for marriage/matrimony?

2. What is my opinion on the indissolubility of marriage/matrimony?

3. How do we strengthen love in the family?

The Christmas Season



Ever since I was a little kid in Mexico Christmas has been a special time for me, I can close my eyes and remember the "posadas" which start on December 16 and run through December 24. It is a tradition to celebrate a posada every night where many get together and reenact when Joseph and Mary got to Bethlehem and asked for a room at the inn and time and time again they were sent away. We do this by way of song, where the group outside represent Joseph and Mary and the group inside rempresent the village innkeepers.

Then we would brake anywhere from two to four pinatas which most of us spent all morning making from scratch. This part of the celebration fun. The pinatas were filled with some candy but mostly fruits such as oranges and sugar canes, as well as a bunch of peanuts. The pinatas were made out of a clay pot which we covered with layers and layers of glued newspapers. We were pretty creative and many different designs were made during the fourteen days.

Every house had a very elaborate Nativity set and going to church on Christmas Eve and Christmas Day was a must. Although we have our own Christmas carols we also have a Spanish version to most of the popular American Christmas Carols. Then believe it or not, firecrackers are a huge part of the celebration as well.

Although we knew of St. Nick most of us kids didn't expect presents, instead we would wait another 13 days and on January 6th we would write a letter to the three Wise Men and put it inside one of our shoes which then were left outside the room doors.

As we came here to the U.S. it wasn't hard to very quickly adopt the American way as we too got caught up with all the gift giving and the food and so on.

Christmas to me is just one happy holiday and the Christas season fills me with joy and peace.

So, I wish you all a Merry Christmas. Celebrate Jesus' birth with your loved ones as this is a wonderful time to spend with the family.

A quote from Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Our enemies are those who harbor hostility against us, not those against whom we cherish hostility… As a Christian I am called to treat my enemy as a brother and to meet hostility with love. My behavior is thus determined not by the way others treat me, but by the treatment I receive from Jesus. ~ Dietrich Bonhoeffer, The Cost of Discipleship.

Fourth Sunday of Advent, AD 2011

A Reading from the Office of Readings
A sermon of St Bernard

The whole world awaits Mary's reply

Photo courtesy of Light on Dark WaterYou have heard, O Virgin, that you will conceive and bear a son; you have heard that it will not be by man but by the Holy Spirit. The angel awaits an answer; it is time for him to return to God who sent him. We too are waiting, O Lady, for your word of compassion; the sentence of condemnation weighs heavily upon us.

The price of our salvation is offered to you. We shall be set free at once if you consent. In the eternal Word of God we all came to be, and behold, we die. In your brief response we are to be remade in order to be recalled to life.

Tearful Adam with his sorrowing family begs this of you, O loving Virgin, in their exile from Paradise. Abraham begs it, David begs it. All the other holy patriarchs, your ancestors, ask it of you, as they dwell in the country of the shadow of death. This is what the whole earth waits for, prostrate at your feet. It is right in doing so, for on your word depends comfort for the wretched, ransom for the captive, freedom for the condemned, indeed, salvation for all the sons of Adam, the whole of your race.

Answer quickly, O Virgin. Reply in haste to the angel, or rather through the angel to the Lord. Answer with a word, receive the Word of God. Speak your own word, conceive the divine Word. Breathe a passing word, embrace the eternal Word.

Why do you delay, why are you afraid? Believe, give praise, and receive. Let humility be bold, let modesty be confident. This is no time for virginal simplicity to forget prudence. In this matter alone, O prudent Virgin, do not fear to be presumptuous. Though modest silence is pleasing, dutiful speech is now more necessary. Open your heart to faith, O blessed Virgin, your lips to praise, your womb to the Creator. See, the desired of all nations is at your door, knocking to enter. If he should pass by because of your delay, in sorrow you would begin to seek him afresh, the One whom your soul loves. Arise, hasten, open. Arise in faith, hasten in devotion, open in praise and thanksgiving. Behold the handmaid of the Lord, she says, be it done to me according to your word. (Source: Universalis.org)

OWS Protesters TIME "Person of the Year". Really?

Brethren, one more thing today from The Outremer:


The OWS protesters have had a minimal impact on policy-making and a lot on draining cities for overtime work cleaning their messes. We, on the other hand, area cleaning other people's messes and then return home - some alive, some barely alive, some not.

This is another reason why TIME magazine is going down the drain.

Today we start singing the "O" Antiphons

Brethren, Peace and Good in Jesus Our Lord "who was, is, and is to come." Today we start singing the Messianic "O" Antiphons during Evening Prayer. This sketch of the Seven Antiphons courtesy of Fr. Maurice Gilbert and Sandro Magister of Chiesa.Com.

They're sung one per day, at the Magnificat during vespers. They are very ancient, and extraordinarily rich in references to the prophecies of the Messiah. Their initials form an acrostic. Here they are in transcription, with a guide to interpretation

ROMA, December 17, 2008 – From today until the day before Christmas Eve, at the Magnificat during vespers in the Roman rite, seven antiphons are sung, one per day, all of them beginning with an invocation to Jesus, although he is never called by name.

The antiphons are very old, going back to the time of Pope Gregory the Great, around the year 600. They are in Latin, and are inspired by the texts of the Old Testament proclaiming the Messiah.

At the beginning of each antiphon, in order, Jesus is invoked as Wisdom, Lord, Root, Key, Star, King, Emmanuel. In Latin: Sapientia, Adonai, Radix, Clavis, Oriens, Rex, Emmanuel.

Read starting from the last, the Latin initials of these words form an acrostic: "Ero cras," meaning: "I will be [there] tomorrow." It is the proclamation of the Lord who comes. The last antiphon, which completes the acrostic, is sung on December 23, and the following day, with first vespers, the feast of the Nativity begins.

These antiphons have been plucked from obscurity by, unexpectedly, "La Civiltà Cattolica," the journal of the Rome Jesuits that is printed after review by the Vatican secretariat of state.

Also unusual is the place of prestige given to the article illustrating the seven antiphons, written by Fr. Maurice Gilbert, director of the Jerusalem branch of the Pontifical Biblical Institute. The article opens the pre-Christmas issue of the magazine, in the spot usually reserved for the editorial.

In the article, Fr. Gilbert illustrates the antiphons one by one. He demonstrates their extremely rich references to the texts of the Old Testament. And he points out one special feature: the last three antiphons include some expressions that can be explained only in the light of the New Testament.

The antiphon "O Oriens" for December 21 includes a clear reference to the Canticle of Zechariah in Chapter 1 of the Gospel of Luke, the "Benedictus": "The daybreak from on high will visit us to shine on those who sit in darkness and death's shadow."

The antiphon "O Rex" for December 22 includes a reference to a passage from the hymn to Jesus in Chapter 2 of the letter of Paul to the Ephesians: "That he might create in himself one new person in place of the two [Jews and pagans]."

The antiphon "O Emmanuel" for December 23, finally, concludes with the invocation "Dominus Deus noster": an exclusively Christian invocation, because only the followers of Jesus recognize the Emmanuel as the Lord their God.

Here, then, are the complete texts of the seven antiphons, in Latin and in translation, with highlighting of the initials that form the acrostic "Ero cras," and in parentheses the main references to the Old and New Testament:

I – December 17

O SAPIENTIA, quae ex ore Altissimi prodiisti, attingens a fine usque ad finem fortiter suaviterque disponens omnia: veni ad docendum nos viam prudentiae.

O Wisdom, who come from the mouth of the Most High (Sirach 24:5), you extend to the ends of the earth, and order all things with power and sweetness (Wisdom 8:1): come and teach us the way of wisdom (Proverbs 9:6).

II – December 18

O ADONAI, dux domus Israel, qui Moysi in igne flammae rubi apparuisti, et in Sina legem dedisti: veni ad redimendum nos in brachio extenso.

O Lord (Exodus 6:2, Vulgate), leader of the house of Israel, who appeared to Moses in the fire of the burning bush (Exodus 3:2) and on Mount Sinai gave him the law (Exodus 20): come and free us with your powerful arm (Exodus 15:12-13).

III – December 19

O RADIX Iesse, qui stas in signum populorum, super quem continebunt reges os suum, quem gentes deprecabuntur: veni ad liberandum nos, iam noli tardare.

O Root of Jesse, who stand as a sign for the peoples (Isaiah 11:10), the kings of the earth are silent before you (Isaiah 52:15) and the nations invoke you: come to free us, do not delay (Habakkuk 2:3).

IV – December 20

O CLAVIS David et sceptrum domus Israel, qui aperis, et nemo claudit; claudis, et nemo aperit: veni et educ vinctum de domo carceris, sedentem in tenebris et umbra mortis.

O Key of David (Isaiah 22:23), scepter of the house of Israel (Genesis 49:10), who open and no one may shut; who shut and no one may open: come, free from prison captive man, who lies in darkness and the shadow of death (Psalm 107: 10, 14).

V – December 21

O ORIENS, splendor lucis aeternae et sol iustitiae: veni et illumina sedentem in tenebris et umbra mortis.

O Star who rises (Zechariah 3:8; Jeremiah 23:5), splendor of the eternal light(Wisdom 7:26) and sun of justice (Malachi 3:20): come and enlighten those who lie in darkness and the shadow of death (Isaiah 9:1; Luke 1:79).

VI – December 22

O REX gentium et desideratus earum, lapis angularis qui facis utraque unum: veni et salva hominem quel de limo formasti.

O King of the nations (Jeremiah 10:7) and their desire (Haggai 2:7), cornerstone (Isaiah 28:16), who reunite Jews and pagans into one (Ephesians 2:14): come and save the man whom you formed from the earth (Genesis 2:7).

VII – December 23

O EMMANUEL, rex et legifer noster, expectatio gentium et salvator earum: veni ad salvandum nos, Dominus Deus noster.

O Emmanuel (Isaiah 7:14), our king and lawgiver (Isaiah 33:22), hope and salvation of the peoples (Genesis 49:10; John 4:42): come to save us, O Lord our God (Isaiah 37:20).

Bye bye, Chris!

Oh yeah, before I forget: multiple newstreams report about the passing of renowned neo-Atheist, Catholic-basher, Mother Teresa-hater, but all-around Hemingwayesque dude, Christopher Hitchens. His not-so-great book about God not being great made lots of waves, despite containing the trite and tired critiques against the existence of God that we all talked about in Middle School.

I am sure he was good to his dog, though - if he had one - and sure, he wrote with spice and I can applaud that. I'll leave it all at that.

Christopher Hitchens: found out how wrong he was at age 62.

Fatima "Secrets": Case Closed

Brethren, Peace and Good to you in Jesus' Holy Name.

Come Holy Spirit! Come by means of the powerful intercession of the Immaculate Heart of Mary, your well-beloved spouse.

I saw this at The New Oxford Review and I thought you all should read it:

Catholics often criticize Protestants for their subjective “private interpretations” of the Scriptures that give short shrift to tradition. Some Catholics, however, are guilty of the very same thing when it comes to private revelations — messages reportedly given by Jesus or Mary to some individual or group of individuals. The 1917 revelations given by the Blessed Virgin Mary to three shepherd children in Fatima, Portugal, during World War I, at the outset of the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, constituted possibly the most portentous wake-up call the Church has ever received. But the interpretation of the three “secrets” our Lady entrusted to the children have been subjected to the vagaries of private interpretation by Catholics who give short shrift to the Magisterium of the Church.

The most egregious example of this phenomenon comes from a Canadian priest, Fr. Nicholas Gruner, the so-called Fatima priest, and the Fatima Center he founded. Fr. Gruner was ordained by the bishop of Avellino, Italy, in 1976, and transferred to Canada, but was suspended after refusing to return to his home diocese. The Vatican’s Congregation for the Clergy confirmed his suspension a divinis (the loss of faculties for celebrating Mass, hearing confessions, etc.) in 2001. The archbishop of Hyderabad, India, however, disagreed with the suspension and incardinated Gruner there — giving rise to confusion about Gruner’s ecclesiastical status, and claims by his supporters that his suspension was invalid.

For many years Fr. Gruner has been insisting that the request our Lady made at Fatima for the consecration of Russia to her Immaculate Heart by the pope in concert with the bishops of the world has not been made in the way the Virgin requested. His sticking point is that the consecration of Russia has not been made by name.

In December 1983, after consulting with Sr. Lucia, the only living Fatima visionary, Pope John Paul II sent out letters inviting all the world’s Catholic bishops, and some Orthodox bishops, to join him in a joint act of con­­secration, scheduled for the feast of the Annunciation, March 25, 1984. In the consecration, the Pope, accompanied not only in spirit by the bishops to whom he sent the letters, but also physically in St. Peter’s Basilica by numerous bishops and cardinals, consecrated the whole world to Mary’s Immaculate Heart. Reportedly fearing retaliation from the Soviet Union, which at the time was threatening to crush the Solidarity movement in Poland, the Pope added a diplomatic but pointed consecration of Russia herself: “In a special way we entrust and consecrate to you those individuals and nations that particularly need to be thus entrusted and consecrated” (italics added).
Read it all here.

Commentary. The late and great Pope, Bl. John Paul II, effected the consecration of Russia to Mary's Immaculate Heart in 1984. End of story. I've never had any doubt about it. Naysayers wish to bind the Church to what is ultimately a private revelation, sure, a powerful one, but still a private revelation which what appear to be exacting, legalistic formality. Brothers and Sisters, this is not how faith, hope, and charity are meant to work.

The message of Our Lady at Fatima is one of repentance, conversion, and penitence. It is Gospel 101. That's why is so rich and layered and that's why millions around the world have privately submitted to Her call, which is that of Her Son. The Fatima message does not stand by itself but it's forever tied to the Gospel and to the public, binding Revelation entrusted to the Church in written and oral form.

Attempts to sever the Message of Our Lady at Fatima from the call to conversion and repentance found in the Gospel and to make it a separate message with its own requirements are at the very least, theologically unsound. At worst, they may be heretical.

Also, obsessive preoccupation with the "real" meaning of the secrets and adhesion to conspiracy theories about their "full publication" is unhealthy to one's spiritual life and not conducive to living the life of conversion and penance which is Our Lady's fundamental call. This is because thinking that Popes John Paul, Benedict, and Sr. Lucia are involved in a conspiracy of lies and silence complicated by vows of obedience are corrosive to one's faith and a fountain for diverse temptations. Now that's what, in my opinion, the devil would want.

Let us embrace, then, the message of Our Lady at Fatima. Let us live a life of constant and joyful repetance, conversion, and penitence. By doing this, we will save the world, and that's what Our Mother wants.

Taking my kitchen into the 21st Century

At a recent get-together of our local cooking club, my friend Linda described her new induction cooktop. It's small and flat, like a tray, can be used anywhere there's a wall outlet (and put away when I need the space), and cooks considerably faster and more efficiently than a conventional stove. Rather than try to explain how it works (with magnets, yet!) I'll refer you to Wikipedia. So I ordered one and brought it home Tuesday night. It's a True-Induction two-burner model. The manual was written by someone for whom English is a second language, but luckily it's a very easy unit to use. They also come in four-burner models, and can be installed in a countertop, but I like being able to move it around.

It requires 110V and needs to be plugged directly into the outlet, not into a power strip. But at least the cord is reasonably long.

Since it works with magnets, my cookware must be stainless steel, enamel or cast iron,  and should be flat-bottomed. This leaves out round-bottomed woks, as well as anything made of aluminum, copper or glass. But I was relieved to find that the two pots my mom left me, which date back to when I was a teenager, are both ferrous. And the two cast iron skillets that came all the way from my friend Sue's antique shop in Oregon. Plus, there are round steel plates available that can be placed on top of the burner which will conduct the heat into any kind of pot.

My old stove is apartment-size, hard to clean, with one of those ovens you hate to light because you can't see what you're doing, and only two burners worked on the four-burner stovetop. I had already given up on the oven, in favor of a portable convection oven, so the stove was taking up a lot of wasted space in my little kitchen. Why not do away with it, replace it with something useful, like a dishwasher? The Capt had a hand in that decision, bringing home a used but still functional (I hope!) dishwasher a couple of weeks ago. He does the dishes most of the time these days and so who was I to begrudge him a little help? And now we'll only need propane to heat water, so a tankful should last us a while longer.

So far I've used the new induction cooktop twice, and it is faster than cooking on gas. Linda warned me until I get used to it I'd better keep an eye on what I'm cooking. For instance, water boils in as little as 90 seconds. And so, perhaps it's true that a watched pot boils after all...

Sirach on Sickness and Medicine


Brethren, Peace and Good to all of you in Jesus Christ Our Lord.

One of my favorite Bible passages are found in the book of Sirach, also called Ecclesiasticus, chapter 38, verses 1-15. It reads thusly:

1 Give doctors the honor they deserve, for the Lord gave them their work to do.[a]2 Their skill came from the Most High, and kings reward them for it.3 Their knowledge gives them a position of importance, and powerful people hold them in high regard.

4 The Lord created medicines from the earth, and a sensible person will not hesitate to use them.5 (A)Didn't a tree once make bitter water fit to drink, so that the Lord's power[b] might be known?6 He gave medical knowledge to human beings, so that we would praise him for the miracles he performs.7-8The druggist mixes these medicines, and the doctor will use them to cure diseases and ease pain. There is no end to the activities of the Lord, who gives health to the people of the world.

9 My child, when you get sick, don't ignore it. Pray to the Lord, and he will make you well.10 Confess all your sins and determine that in the future you will live a righteous life.11 Offer incense and a grain offering, as fine as you can afford.[c]12 Then call the doctor—for the Lord created him—and keep him at your side; you need him.13 There are times when you have to depend on his skill.14 The doctor's prayer is that the Lord will make him able to ease his patients' pain and make them well again.15 As for the person who sins against his Creator, he deserves to be sick. (Good News Translation via Bible Gateway)

I think these verses have had a profound influence in the way the Catholic Church views illness and healing. Yes, we Catholics pray for the healing of body, soul, and spirit, even for miracles, but we also trust medical science and we do so in large measure because of the verses above. That’s why you don’t see Catholic faith healers roaming about and those whose vocation is to pray for the sick do so under the strict directives found in the Instruction of Prayers for Healing published by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith back in 2000 – when the current Holy Father was the prefect. The Instruction states:

§ 3. Anything resembling hysteria, artificiality, theatricality or sensationalism, above all on the part of those who are in charge of such gatherings, must not take place.

For a Catholic, the choice is not between prayer and medicine, but a holistic, synergistic approach of both. If the Protestant Reformers hadn’t ejected Sirach from the canon, sects like Christian Science or Jehovah’s Witnesses which deny, or severely limit the practice of life-saving medicine, may have never arisen.

My brothers and sisters: everything is a gift. Healing, whether it comes from the hands of a physician or from answered prayer – or from both, usually – is always a gift from God. May the Lord bless us all, and keep us in good health to glorify Him, Amen.

My Experience Before "La Guadalupana" (Repost)

Brethren, Peace and Good to All of you in Jesus' Name. Today, in honor of this day when we remember Our Lady of Guadalupe, I wanted to share with you again my impressions of a pilgrimage I undertook to her Basilica in Mexico City back in December, 2004. Enjoy!

Greetings, folks! I'm back from my business trip to Mexico City, where all was not serious work, but also a bit of fun. The highlight was a personal pilgrimage to the largest Marian Shrine in Christendom, the Basilica of the Blessed Virgin Mary, Our Lady of Guadalupe.

I got there last Thursday, late in the afternoon. The week-long celebrations leading to her feast day on December 12 that saw over 10 million pilgrims had just concluded and the town of Guadalupe Hidalgo was still a tad disheveled for the wear-and-tear.

I entered the plaza from the underground parking and started taking pictures inside and out, then I entered the Basilica and was bedazzled by its sheer size and space. My eyes went straight to this Icon "not painted by hands" as--Eastern Christians might describe it--and wondered how I could approach it, since it was right behind the altar. One of the hourly Masses was just coming to an end and in the meantime, my hostess another two guests and I walked toward the crypt, not knowing that my question will be answered right there, for you see, the wall behind the altar is separated from it by several feet, its closeness to the altar an optical illusion created by the sheer size of the building.

View of the Image from the Altar-Photo EWTNThe "gap" behind, between, and below the altar and the Image is really a passage way pilgrims may access to beheld the Icon closely without disturbing the Sacrifice of the Mass constantly going on at the altar. One gains access to it through the crypts. Ironically, that's where an ancient faith and cultus meet modern technology. As I entered the crypt I saw four mobile sidewalks, the kind you may see at any airport; three go in one direction and one returns. The pilgrim "rides" the belt as s/he contemplates the image.

All the pedestrian, tacky things aside, as well as the press of humanity converging on the Shrine with all its accouterments, I have to say that my moments there were precious, intimate, and contemplative. It is difficult for me to describe the sense of wonderment that filled me as I saw the ancient image, photographically printed, some say, on cloth. I "felt" Our Lady's motherly concern and love very distinctly and dare I say, very personally, as if it were directed solely and uniquely to me. It was strange, it was powerful, overwhelming. The Holy Image out shined and eclipse everything else but Her and through Her, the Son. All this crowned, as it were, when Christ Himself, substantially, hidden behind the species of bread and wine, came to me once again. It was the Mother who prepared the encounter and reacquainted us once again, as she had done to others so long and has continued to do down the centuries.

I have seen copies and renditions of this Holy Icon elsewhere before. Incidentally, the Cathedral church of my birthplace in Ponce, Puerto Rico (pictured at right) is dedicated to Our Lady of Guadalupe. An authenticated replica of the Image hangs over one of its side altars. I've seen other replicas in other places, but let me tell you, none of these ever moved me as much as the real thing.

I cannot explain my experience completely during my visit there, nor can I tell you that mine may be termed a "typical" experience. Nothing in the outside really prepares you for the encounter! The collective psychological pressure of the place and the people around you is not enough to explain away the sense of intimacy that I had with the Mother of Jesus and our Mother in that holy place. I tell you this: for a brief moment, all doubts I had melted and for the moment I beheld Her clearly on that photograph, I was in Heaven. How good it was to be there! I was tempted to build a tent for me and my companions on that Marian Tabor.

If you ever have a chance to visit there, go. You won't regret it.

Well, I am back, I am happy to be back, and now this little project of mine, this blog, will continue with renewed faith and devotion, now also dedicated to our Lady of Guadalupe, once of Nazareth, now of the World. ¡Viva Cristo Rey! ¡Viva Santa María de Guadalupe!

Christ Pantokrator: The Ruler of All


File:Christ Pantokrator, Cathedral of Cefalù, Sicily.jpg

Holy God,
Holy Mighty One
Holy Immortal One
Have Mercy on Us!

In Christian iconography, Christ Pantokrator refers to a specific depiction of Christ. Pantocrator or Pantokrator (from the Greek Παντοκράτωρ) is a translation of one of many Names of God in Judaism. When the Hebrew Bible was translated into Greek as the Septuagint, Pantokrator was used both for YHWH Tzevaot "Lord of Hosts" and for El Shaddai "God Almighty". In the New Testament, Pantokrator is used once by Saint Paul (2 Cor 6:18). Aside from that one occurrence, the author of the Book of Revelation is the only New Testament author to use the word Pantokrator. The author of Revelation uses the word nine times,[3] and while the references to God and Christ in Revelation are at times interchangeable, Pantokrator appears to be reserved for God alone. (Source: Wikipedia)

Brethren, may the contemplation of this icon of the Icon of God bring you joy this Third Sunday of Advent, Gaudete Sunday.

The Truth About 2012 (Repost)

Because things tend to have simpler explanations…

Believing in God is like being in love, or like listening to a vast, awesome symphony

Brethren, may the Peace of Christ that surpasses every understanding be always with you and all His Good and Blessings and the happiness that spring from them eternally.

Faith as being in love

Some time back, a friend asked me how did it feel like to believe in God. The friend – a young lady who had suffered much in life and who counted herself as a unbeliever – asked it of me, earnestly.

I was stumped.

Much later I answered her that believing in God is a lot  like being in love: one always thinks of the Beloved, His reality fills one’s senses, aspirations, and hope, and one’s soul can’t wait to unite herself in love with Him who Himself is Love. My answer was a shot in the dark, coming well after we had stopped talking to each other – she also had a thin skin for political discussion or probing questions about her ultimate values. No matter.

If you have been in love – and I have been with my wife for 30 years now – then you will understand the simile. Faith is not a mere intellectual assent to articles of belief proposed by the Church, it is that, but it is much more. The dogmas of the Church are lamps lighting the way, means to an end and not ends in themselves. The end, is God himself, his Person, and the communion of the creature with His all-transforming love.

If you have never been in love,really in love and not merely infatuated or emotionally co-dependent, then you will not know what I mean. Perhaps by loving another, really loving someone outside yourself, your heart will crack open enough to love God, for to believe in Him is to love Him.

Faith as listening to a symphony

One of the dictionary definitions of symphony is “Harmony, especially of sound or color.” Sometimes the harmony of sound and light may be effected, as in the Disney movie Fantasia. The essence of a symphony  is the harmony of tempo and music, the blending of the instruments, the artistry of the players, the discipline of the conductor, and the passions of the composer. The educated ear detects the harmonious layering of sound but only the heart of the hearer  is able to understand the heart of the composer. If we ignore one’s heart – one’s soul, really – we lost a full dimension of music, perhaps the dimension that matters most.

Engraving of Dante's Empireal HeavenFr. Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange, whose The Three Ages of the Interior Life (2 Volume Set) I’ve been slowly and prayerfully plodding through, provided me with another simile:

Infused faith is like a faculty of supernatural audition, like a higher musical sense, which permits us to hear the spiritual harmonies of the kingdom of heaven, to hear, in a way, the voice of God through the prophets and His Son before we are admitted to see Him face to face. Between the unbeliever, who studies the Gospel, and the believer, there is a difference similar to that which exists between two persons who are listening to a Beethoven symphony, one of whom has a musical ear and the other has not. Both hear all the notes of the symphony, but one alone grasps its meaning and its soul. Similarly, only the believer adheres supernaturally to the Gospel as to the supernatural word of God; and he adheres to it even though untutored, while the learned man with all his means of criticism cannot, without infused faith, adhere to it in this manner. "He that believeth in the Son of God, hath the testimony of God in himself."

It follows too that the unbeliever, particularly the militant one, the one who seeks increasing restrictions upon the freedom of expression and the open participation of Christian believers in the public arena, that unbeliever is tone deaf. In fact, in his darkness, the unbelievers rejoices at the fact of being tone deaf and in his delusion, he wants everyone around him to be tone deaf too. But I digress.

Of course, there are people in darkness out there who can appreciate a good symphony. Legends recount how Nero fiddled while watching Rome burn, and how, upon his death, he lamented how the world had lost a great poet. Hitler liked Wagner and if I recall correctly, racist and convicted criminal Matthew F. Hale was an accomplished musician. It stands to reason that passion for music or poetry alone does not prepare a person to believe in God. That’s because to listen to God’s symphony one has to be able to love with an open heart, holding nothing back, which takes us back to the first comparison: believing in God in a manner of speaking, is being in love with God.

Bottom line: if you are, or ever been, in love that includes total surrender of self for the good of another, you have a good inkling of what believing or “having faith” is all about. If you can appreciate a symphony with more than your physical senses, but with your soul also, that would be another fair comparison. If you can do both, you are well on your way to faith. If you can do neither, you better go home and reexamine your life.

Lancaster Trip



So I left at a good time, but not as early as I wanted, after gassing up and running some errands I finally hit the road. As I said to my son shortly after boarding his truck I was looking for the wire to pull and make the air horns work. I am so used to both my Mustangs being so low to the ground that even his regular not so tall Silverado felt sky high to me.

My son's Silverado, not too bad a truck, and yes it fit him just fine.

Not being to familiar with his truck I decided to take it easy on the speed and the gas, so I kept it at a legal speed. I had a soda before I left so right away my bladder started to talk to me and to ask me to stop. The first rest stop is by the Palo Verde nuclear plant, and right before I got there I notice a strange cloud formation that went up and then had a 90 degree angle bend. Upon further inspection I noticed it was some sort of a steam cloud coming out of the plant.

This cloud started on the ground and went up into the sky.

I stopped in Quartzite to fill the gas tank again but proceeded right away. When I got to Chirico Summit to get me a coffee I noticed a bunch of new things I could photograph that I had not seen before. These place never runs out of thing to take pictures off and before I knew it over half an hour had passed. That was my last stop before getting to Lancaster but it took me forever to get there. Nevertheless, the trip was very nice, the truck is really comfortable and my reliable phone's GPS app once again proved to be extremely reliable.






Scenes from Chiriaco Summit.

It was nice visiting Abby in her own turf as we had always met either at my sister's or her mom's in La Puente. We had a good time shopping late and falling asleep watching movies, as well as in cleaning out the storage rental unit she had. Mission accomplished in this trip to Lancaster.